Cord Cutting is getting better— but more expensive

TVHubby and I haven’t had cable in more than a decade, and we’ve been with without DirecTV for a while now. Instead, we have watched Netflix streaming (including the DVD feature) and Hulu. Then, there’s YouTube, which gets better and better, but those ads are oh, so annoying. A service that we seldom used at first, Amazon Prime, is getting better, and they are offering something quite interesting: channels ala carte. You can take a look at that here:

Join Amazon Channels Free Trial

My favorite service, still, is Netflix, but as original programming supplants purchased programing, I’m liking it less. Since we are fans of college football, I have been buying a subscription to SlingTV each fall. While it too is getting better, Sling has ads and a plethora of “infomercials” that can be watched on demand. Yep, I paid $40 for the full package, and I get the opportunity to watch ads, short and long. And, this year I keep seeing “your event is blacked out.” The on demand offerings seem quite arbitrary, as sometimes there are multiple episodes available, but on other days there are fewer. Needless to say, if this continues, I won’t even give Sling its seasonal run in the future.

Netflix is about $29 per month (for a family plan + DVDs), Hulu is $9 per month, and Sling is $40. Amazon offers benefits beyond streaming, so let’s add another $5 to the total. That makes $83 per month for online entertainment; each service overlaps a bit, yet each offers something unique. YouTube, HBOgo, CBS all-access, and others would love to have some monthly moola, so clearly there needs to be one service that provides everything (cable + DVR?) Disney has been teasing two different services in the future, one for entertainment and one for sports. If they do, the fracturing of the entertainment empire will probably get worse.

Right now, cord cutting is more and more in vogue, but one of the big players needs to add live sports. Whichever one can manage that will win enough customers to have more buying clout with networks. I’m not a gambler by nature, but I’d pick Amazon to win, Netflix to place, and Hulu to show.

Advertisements

Beauty and the Beast— on DVD

Beauty
Perhaps you are like me—I was interested in the latest Disney cartoon classic to live action reboot, but not enough to plunk down the money to see it in the movie cinema. So, you waited, or might still be waiting. Worth seeing? Yes or no?

Maybe. Sorry, but that is my best answer, having rented Beauty and the Beast (2017)  recently. I remember watching the animated one (on VHS!) with family members, and I thought then that it was state of the art for that style of animation. It still is, I would think. But, Pixar type technologies have, for the most part, left traditional animation of feature films in the dust of entertainment history. So, to bring this film to a new generation, Disney decided to do a combination of live action and modern CGI for the beast.

This film is very, very true to the original. Fans of the music will have no gripes, and the sets are simply amazing. The live action part of the new movie is darned good, but it is so faithful to the previous effort that it seems just a bit too “cartoony” if that makes any sense. For instance, I enjoyed the CGI teapot much more than the live actress. The same is true for most of the characters. The CGI beast, however, was just a bit to phony looking, so I liked the prince better.

If any actors stand out in the new film, my picks are Luke Evans who plays Gaston to the hilt, even if he isn’t really “as big as a barge” as the lyrics state, and Kevin Kline as Maurice, who makes the father seem eccentric enough to need his daughter to take up for him. Emma Watson does a very good job as Belle, although I don’t think she looks the part. If the credits didn’t name Ewan McGregor as Lumière, then I don’t think I would have known him, although I’ve always admired his work. Those who have stated that Disney only made this film to make money are correct, but Disney is a corporation whose main mission is to make money for its share holders, so that is not exactly a valid criticism.

So, back to the original question. Should you see it? Sure, why not? But, I must say, if I wanted to share it with children, I’d go for the original, which is still available: Beauty and the Beast: 25th Anniversary Edition.

Dark Matter— review and commentary

Dark Matter from FBFor the most part, the SyFy channel has seemed more like the “Horror channel” to me. So many of their original works seemed to rely either on horror or even fantasy that I seldom watched it, back when we were cable subscribers. However, the series Dark Matter: Season 1 [Blu-ray] (which I’ve been binge watching lately) is certainly an exception to that. Here is a series which blends elements of hard and soft science fiction writing, plus some really good acting and nifty special effects, into an entertaining and occasionally thought provoking original science fiction series.

The initial premise is a fabulous launching point: Six people wake up from stasis pods on a ship, and none of them remembers their respective pasts. Action ensues almost immediately, as the ship’s android viciously attacks. Once the android is sorted out, then this motley crew sets about sorting out who they are and what the mission of this ship might be. All of the cast members do a good job with their parts, but Melissa O’Neil is particularly watchable as her “Two” character quickly becomes the center of this strong ensemble.

Each episode helps unravel the mysteries, while bringing in new characters and situations. As the series unfolds, most of the characters learn of unsavory bits in their past lives, which affects how they interact with each other and the characters they meet as they travel though space. Hard science fiction elements (the science part) include the technology of stasis, of artificial intelligence, faster than light space travel, and genetic engineering. Softer science fiction elements (the emotional and social aspects of technology) include how the characters react to their collective amnesia, how they interact with other cultures, the ethics of certain criminal activities, and how the politics of their time and space play out.

Among the players of this futuristic universe are large corporations, mostly depicted as being at war with each other. Government is largely a pawn of the corporations. Science fiction grand master Robert A. Heinlein played with similar themes in his novel, Friday, which also dealt with genetic engineering and the ethical dilemmas which accompany it. Science fiction requires good writing, as “fiction” is part of the term, and the writers of Dark Matter seldom disappoint. If there is a weakness, some of the space travel effects are a bit cheesy compared to modern movie making, but hey, it is a television show!

Science fiction is mythology for modern man. (I’d love to take credit for that, but I got the idea from reading about science fiction and mythology, including The Hero with a Thousand Faces (The Collected Works of Joseph Campbell)  There is much to like in the series Dark Matter, which is on currently on the SyFy channel, as well as via streaming services and on DVD. I highly recommend it.

Hidden Figures— review and commentary

I’m not much of a numbers person, but I know those who are, and I do admire “nerds.” The film (now on DVD) based on the book Hidden Figures: The American Dream and the Untold Story of the Black Women Mathematicians Who Helped Win the Space Race is about space exploration, history, race relations in America, and math. I’m glad the filmmakers concentrated on the first three, because I got lost pretty quickly with the equation solved in the exposition.

I’ve always been a fan of clever titles. (I wrote Once Upon a Dirtball, you know.) Hidden Figures is a perfect title, because it conveys that this is a film about math and mathematicians, some of whom were “colored” and therefore not to be taken seriously by society, but, the script makes it plain that these brilliant minds were critical to NASA’s success.

The cast is outstanding, if a bit too good looking for the fifties and early sixties. The script is even better. Some of the lines in the film are no doubt fictionalized, but the prickly encounters between Katherine Goble, Dorothy Vaughn, and Mary Jackson and their white co-workers probably did happen. One of my favorite parts in the film is when John Glenn refuses to fly until Katherine checks over the calculations necessary for bringing his capsule back safely. However, in reading about Katherine Goble Johnson’s contributions to NASA, she calls it all “team work.”

When doing a “based on real events” known to the audience, such as we all know John Glenn made it back to earth safely, maintaining suspense can be tricky. By telling the story behind the scenes, those problems are mostly eliminated. Even the climactic scenes are handled with skill as the nation pauses to watch what happens with the flight of Freedom 7.

Whether or not you are a fan of science, technology, engineering or math, I think you’ll find Hidden Figures a great way to spend an evening. As of this post, the film got 93% fresh rating from Rotten Tomatoes. And, I don’t always agree with that site, I certainly enjoyed this film. Rent it or buy it!

Supergirl— Television’s best female superhero?


Super hero flicks are hot these days, and I’ve been catching up on episodes of Supergirl, starring Melissa Benoist in the title role. The series began on CBS and then jumped to something called the CW. Overall, I’m impressed with this series, although it is clearly made for television and the effects sometimes show that. After recently seeing Wonder Woman on the big screen, this yarn pales a bit. Still, Supergirl offers super hero stories to a stay at home audience. (I am viewing it via Netflix.)

Here’s the “good” stuff: Melissa Benoist is a fabulous casting choice. She looks the part, and she can pull off the “little ole me” part of Kara Danvers (Supergirl’s day job character) very well. Although the scripts are not great, she gives it her all, and both Kara and Supergirl are likable. Indeed, casting is one of the strong suites of this show. The supporting cast is pretty good overall. My favorite character in the supporting cast, media mogul Cat Grant, portrayed by Calista Flockhart, didn’t make it to the second season, and that is regrettable. There were apparently some issues with the filming location, which changed when the series moved to the CW, and Flockhart was no longer available. Others are still giving Supergirl/Kara Danvers support, including the super cute Jeremy Jordan as Winn Shott, Mehcad Brooks as a grown up James (Jimmy) Olsen, and Chyler Leigh as adopted sister, Alex Danvers. I rather liked the tie ins with Super Man in the first couple of episodes of season two.

Here’s the “whatever” stuff: The scripts seem lifted from Justice League comics. For fans of comic books, these plots are probably welcome. For me, sometimes I just can’t really get into them. The effects range from pretty awesome to pretty boring, but nothing looks ridiculous. By and large the costumes look good, but nothing stands out as amazing. The same can be said for the sets and use of locations, which are good enough for television.

Here’s the “bad” stuff: The dialogue can be really basic, and the plots tend to repeat too often. The whole “DEO” organization is just too convenient as a means of parading weird looking villains out for Supergirl to fight each episode. Sometimes, the writers should change it up and have a “man against nature” conflict, instead of “one alien against another” every episode.

Still, for viewers who want a female superhero, Supergirl fills the bill. Take a look, if you haven’t already tuned in to this made for television series.

Valentine’s Day films

popcorn in a boxOkay, maybe this idea isn’t all that romantic, but the weather is rather chilly here in northern Georgia, so cuddling up inside with Netflix on the television, a big fire in the hearth, and a bowl of popcorn sounds like a pretty good plan.

But, what to watch? Nowadays, comedy = a very foul mouth and romance = sex. So, maybe romantics should choose something that has been out for a while. There are lots of such lists, but here’s mine:

Grease— released in 1978, but with a late 50’s vibe, very good performances, and a really amazing musical score

Sleepless In Seattle— released in 1993, with some very good actors and an even better script

Bewitched— (the 2005 film) is an odd twist to the 60s classic tv sit-com

Shakespeare in Love— released in 1998 has one of the very best performances of Romeo and Juliet on film, and it is very clever all around

Singin’ in the Rain— 1952, a light-hearted classic, from the era when musicals were all the rage

Breakfast At Tiffany’s— 1961, based on Truman Capote’s classic story, and most people remember Audrey Hepburn’s role

His Girl Friday— 1940, the oldest film on the list, but from an era when comedy meant being funny, with a strong cast

Pop some corn and get started on your romantic weekend!